Looking back on 2013, construction machinery industry stumbled in hardware came over. Faced with a still sluggish market conditions, industry, enterprise and its practitioners should be concerned by what is in the end, how to change?

A few years ago, to show their talents in the field of equipment manufacturing, mechanical engineering Zhuanghuai surging metal industry seems very rewarding and even a slight ego. However, things have changed. In 2012 market downturn suffered "heavy losses", the year of construction machinery market is still showing the trend continued to adjust. This can be clearly confirmed from major listed companies within the industry semi-annual report. Still digesting inventory, receivables heavy pressure, the market demand in the doldrums, so that the listed company's share price fell into the "basement." Expand overseas markets this year, worth almost become the only highlight of the book industry. All this makes the once vibrant industry extraordinarily noisy silence in 2013, companies seem even quarrel, bicker all the momentum dissipated.

According to insiders, the past two years, related hardware engineering machinery exhibition in previous years are more foreboding. Speaking morale, more business people said, speaking to the current market situation, most companies do is stronger than anyone else with the power of endurance and fight and quite longer. If so, it seems like the Masai Mara savannah touches those suffering from hunger lion, looking forward to the return of herbivores migrate earlier general.

In fact, the current hardware engineering machinery industry experienced, universal in equipment manufacturing sub-sectors, the development of Chinese industry seems to always be in the habit of copying mode "Great Leap Forward", regardless of how many times experienced like Guan "Guagu poison "as the pain expense. From textiles, white goods, to the car, to the moment of engineering machinery, hardware, wind power, photovoltaic industry, most of the case.

Although intellectuals including government think tank has still relentlessly studied the organic linking China manufacturing industry more rational layout and strip each other. However, the reality is very cruel. So, in the end can not be, or not to do?

Right now, the views are more focused on the adjustment of industrial structure, change the growth mode. But the more content appear vague and conceptualization. In fact, according to the website for the nine are building materials, requiring structural adjustment, to the way of the early "15" government work report had clearly stated. The past ten years, why still tune without fruit? This is not like China despite the most severe punishment of intellectual property protection laws across the globe, but the cottage, counterfeiting phenomenon is still popular the same?

A former SASAC official SOE reform in its monograph states: state-owned capital should quit competitive industries, while focusing on the public and welfare fields. It looks more like a utopian idea of design is perhaps touched the essence of the problem.

Chinese manufacturing overcapacity capital formation and investment properties constitute indeed be necessary to sort out. In the end what is the nature of capital is more interested in "Great Leap Forward" of the industry build mode? Explain this issue should not be difficult. For example, where the state-owned enterprises involved in the project include the excavator and the project has not yet been put into the account of production, is to be a comprehensive statistics. If you add to this the state-owned investment funds and state-holding enterprises be included in the statistics, I believe that things will be very clear.

Importantly, change should not just stop at the concept. In this sense, the change should not only be for the industry and enterprises. Otherwise, the compression capacity remain the same from time to time as the arrival of the economic cycle, and the establishment of a new mode of economic growth can only be in the foreseeable future.